Expository Essay Examples and Tips of a Proper Writing That Will Be Helpful for Students

What is an Expository Essay. Examples of Well-structured and Written Essays Probably everyone knows what an essay is. And what is an expository essay? It is a kind of an essay that presumes making a description, illustration and clarification of the chosen topic or problem. A writer has to make everything clear for the reader with the help of his writings. Some other methods like evaluation or investigation for clarification of the problem can also be used. In short words, after reading your essay the reader should have a clear and a well-explained idea. Does it sound too difficult? It depends on the mood with which you are looking at the problem. Really! Just try to imagine that your good friend asked you a question about something you are good in. You are to give him as many details as you can with the summary of your explanation in conclusion. Does it sound better now? Definitely, yes! So, if it is easier for you to talk to your friend, start ‘answering’ him. And when all your thoughts are written down, just make them look like an ideal case study or expository essay. Expository essay. Examples of proper structure If this essay isn’t the first one you are going to write, you probably know that every paper has a similar structure: it should be started with introduction, followed with a main body that contains claims and evidences, and finished with a conclusion. Using this common structure and the topic you are going to work with, create a plan that will help you to write your essay. Expository essay. Examples of best writing tips As with writing any academic paper, writing of an expository essay should be started with surfing for information. Yes, it is a must; even if you have a strong feeling that you already know everything about your topic. If you are sure that you have already read all the Internet sources, you can always visit a library. Books and journals store a lot of useful information. Make sure that all the sources you use are reliable. Blogs of unknown Internet users aren’t one of them. Every problem or claim you announce in your essay should be supported by evidence. Don’t use the claim you won’t be able to support. Better less but more qualitatively. You need to be objective. Your essay shouldn’t be influenced by prejudices, feelings or emotions. Your main goal is to present the topic unbiasedly. Let your language and sentences be clear and of a normal length. Try to avoid kilometer long sentences, because until it will be read till the last word, the first words will be forgotten. Don’t make your reader feel pressured and tired. All the facts, evidences or other info items you use should be well-organized: in preference manner or chronically etc. Expository essay. Examples of best topics Every person has personal area of interests and from one side it is great if you weren’t given the exact topic by a teacher, because you can choose the one to your liking and interests. On another side, one can feel lost without any real idea of the topic for an expository essay or good argumentative essay. Starting your search for an expository essay topic or , remember that a successfully chosen topic means almost the half of the victory. Some topics below might help you with this matter. You can choose the one suggested or create your own, using following ideas. Digital gadgets and how they influence everyday life. Weight loss: healthy trend or tribute to fashion. Perennial problem of vaccination. The main goal of modern medicine: to treat or to earn money? Why reading makes people better? Appearance or personality – what is really more important in a modern society? A kind-hearted person: how to survive in modern world? What situation from the past (choose any) you would change and why. What does your clothes style mean to you? How the everyday life of middle class has changed during the last 100 years? What century would you like to live in and why. Modern Bible: how close is it to the original? Can life goals be unachievable? The goal is something that makes a human work on personal realization and leaves no possibility to give up. Goals in life spark human’s heart and soul, fill him with optimism and hopes for the better. A man with strong wish to reach his goal will find hundreds of possibilities to do it, but the lazy one will definitely create thousands of reasons for doing nothing. Some people prefer avoiding impressive aims, as they are unreachable in their opinion. Is it really so or it is just necessary to make more efforts to achieve something unachievable? Really, there are no goals that can’t be reached. A person, who is overwhelmed by idea, can move mountains. He continues his way even if meets difficulties and when his luck is bad. He doesn’t see any obstacles; he sees possibilities and opportunities of reaching his goal. There is the quotation of Leonardo da Vinci that goes as following: â€Å"The one who skywards, doesn’t turn around†.   We meet such people in the novel â€Å"The Mysterious Island† by Jules Verne. A small group of people finds itself on uninhabited island among the ocean. Even in such a difficult situation the men don’t give up in despair.   Under auspices of Cyrus Smith they start turning the uninhabited island into a good place for living. Beginning with nothing, with the course of time they create a waterline, a telegraph, grown corn, build houses, go hunting etc. All the efforts they have done together give them the possibility to build a ship that takes them back home. Even after all the obstacles they come back home! One would think it was an unreachable goal but the heroes proved the different! So, as a consequence it can be said that there are no unachievable goals. There is a lack of desire to do something and laziness. Everything can be reached and achieved but some of the goals just need more efforts to be done. If you want something – just do it!

A Tale of Two Mermaids A Comparison of Hans Christian Andersen Disney’s Protagonists - Literature Essay Samples

Hans Christian Andersens classic fairy tale â€Å"The Little Mermaid† and Disney’s 1989 film adaptation differ in a multitude of notable ways, from key elements of plot to those of character. Perhaps the most distinct difference, aside from the highly contrasting endings, is the characterization of the protagonists, the little mermaids themselves. Disney’s version presents to its viewers a wild, adventurous, 16-year-old girl named Ariel, while Andersen’s original story features a pensive and quiet 15-year-old who remains nameless throughout the entirety of the tale. Due to her rebellious, outspoken nature, Ariel’s character may initially appear to viewers as a more positive, feminist role model for girls and young women. After all, the Disney film was released about 150 years after the first publication of Andersen’s â€Å"The Little Mermaid,† during which the women’s rights movement made countless advancements in the western world and beyondperhaps most notably, women in the United States gained the right to vote with the ratification of the 19th amendment in 1920. However, despite this vastly different cultural climate, Disneys Ariel still ultimately proves to be under patriarchal reign, in some ways even more so than Andersens original little mermaid. It is essential to note that each mermaid exists in an entirely different cultural landscape. Andersen’s well-known fairy tales were published during the Romantic period, during which a multitude of writers and other artists rejected the rational ideals of the Enlightenment in favor of the key principles of individualism, reverence for nature, and emotionality. Andersen’s little mermaid exemplifies these new ideals. She is repeatedly described as a â€Å"quiet and thoughtful† child who appreciates art and nature (150). Her personal garden, unlike those of her sisters, pays homage to natural elements rather than material ones; their gardens are â€Å"filled with all sorts of things that they had collected from shipwrecks† while hers contains only one non-natural object: â€Å"a marble statue† (150, emphasis added). This statue is not just a â€Å"thing† but a work of art, which the mermaid practically worships, even â€Å"embracing† it after noticing its resemblance to her beloved prince (157). Additionally, when she is finally allowed to ascend to the waters surface, the first thing the little mermaid sees and admires is the sunseta natural element rather than a man-made one, like the ship, which she notices only after viewing the sun. So, Andersen’s little mermaid seems to be a true Romantic heroine, endowed with all the qualities that would have been considered ideal during Andersen’s time. Disney’s Ariel, on the other hand, represents an entirely new and different kind of woman. Like the older sisters of Andersen’s little mermaid, she has a vast collection of â€Å"things,† all of which are incredibly important to her. In this way, she is a true modern woman. Her dearest desire is to live within a capitalistic society where one’s ultimate goal is not to appreciate art and nature but only to acquire more and more things. Thus, Ariel and Andersen’s little mermaid contrast starkly due to the values of their respective societies. Another key difference between the societies in which Ariel and Andersen’s little mermaid exist is their patriarchal and matriarchal natures, respectively. In both narratives, the little mermaid has several sisters and no brothers. But in Andersen’s tale, the little mermaid and her sisters are raised primarily by their paternal grandmother, who is portrayed as a distinctly feminine character, with her jewelry and stories for the mermaids. Interestingly, the girls’ father plays almost no role in the story. So, the little mermaid is raised surrounded by women, in a decidedly matriarchal society. The Disney version, however, entirely eliminates the grandmother character, choosing instead to give Ariel’s father, King Triton, a substantial role in the plot. Indeed, it is his harsh and destructive actions, combined with her love for Prince Eric, that ultimately cause Ariel to visit Ursula the sea-witch, not her own desire for a soul, as in the original story. Therefore, female autonomy is diminished in this newer version; despite Ariel’s apparent spunkiness, her actions are largely reactive to those of men and thus less reflective of her own desires and inclinations. Disney’s film also includes the addition of several other key male characters: Flounder, Ariel’s sidekick, Sebastian, her paternally-appointed babysitter, and Scuttle, the kooky seagull with supposed knowledge of the human world. Aside from Flounder, who can be assumed to be younger than Ariel due to his babyish voice, each of these characters is tasked with guiding Ariel in some way or another. Sebastian must provide the â€Å"constant supervision† that a girl her age supposedly must receive, and Scuttle gives his comical analysis of human objects and rituals. It is notable that Ariel’s first step when encountering these foreign objects is not to attempt to discern their uses for herself, but immediately seek the guidance of a male. She also does not in any way question Scuttle’s statements, no matter how strange they sound. In this way, Scuttle serves as the masculine replacement for the grandmother in the original tale in that he provides in formation about the human world, like the grandmother did, but filtered through a male perspective. As for Flounder, the fact that Ariel actively chooses the company of a male than her sisters clearly illustrates her entrenchment in patriarchal society. Though Flounder is shown as cowardly and meek, often holding her back on her daring adventures, his company is still preferable to that of another woman. Also, although he is a rather two-dimensional character, he is still given much more of a personality than Ariel’s sisters, between which there are no distinctions other than their names. In Andersen’s story, each mermaid is shown to be different through their first interactions with the human world; for example, one is too meek to venture close to human life, while another is so bold that she swims right up a river into a highly populated area. The addition of each of these male characters and deletion or neglect of the female ones causes Disney’s Ariel to exist in an utterly patriarchal world. Overall, though Ariel may at first seem like a more progressive representation of femininity than some other fairy-tale women, including Andersen’s original little mermaid, closer analysis reveals her true lack of any meaningful sense of autonomy. In the end, she is simply and clearly transferred from her father’s authority to that of Eric, her husband. Alternatively, Andersen’s tale, shows that women, too, can be active participants in the intellectual discourse of the time by featuring a female character who truly embodies the ideals of Romanticism. Works Cited Andersen, H. C. The Little Mermaid. Hans Andersen: His Classic Fairy Tales. Trans. Erik Christian. Haugaard. London: Victor Gollancz, 1985. Print. The Little Mermaid. Dir. Ron Clements and John Musker. Perf. Jodi Benson and Christopher Barnes. Walt Disney Pictures, 1989. DVD.